Microfinance Investment in Sub Saharan Africa
Microfinance Networks in Sub Saharan Africa

Microfinance Investment in Sub Saharan Africa
Microfinance and SSA
Since 1995 many Sub Saharan African economies appear to have achieved early stages of economic growth. Their performance has reversed the economic collapses that marked the period from 1975 to 1985, and the economic stagnation from 1985 and 1995. The ability to support, sustain and diversify the sources of these growth indicators will be critical to the elevation of countries to middle and high income countries and to meeting the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs).
In 2007, sub-Saharan Africa experienced economic growth of 6.7 percent and continued to accelerate progress in human development, improve the huge lack of infrastructure, and strengthen governance. Africa also received renewed attention from the private sector, funders, domestic and international investors, and development agencies. Microfinance has been able to capitalize on these positive developments, experiencing strong growth in recent years.
Still, poverty remains a critical challenge for this region. With an average of 70% of the population living under $2 a day, and GNI per capita averaging approximately USD $965 (compared to $38,000 average in the industrialized countries), the region is hardly stable. The combined GDP of SSA in 2008 was US$744 billion, which was equivalent of 28% of China’s GDP, 69% of Brazil’s, or 80% of India’s. In addition, SSA consistently scores the lowest ratings in the Human Development and Millenium Development indices relating to health and education levels. However, the size and strength of sub-Saharan Africa economies are considerably diverse; with the economies of South Africa and Nigeria comprising 56% of SSA’s combined GDP.
On the other hand, a recent study by WWB and the African Microfinance Action Forum (AMAF) found that more people in low-income market segments in countries across Africa are now able to access an increasing range of financial products.
Astounding progress has been made in the delivery of financial services to low-income markets in Africa over the past ten years, in particular during the past five years. In Ethiopia there was hardly any microfinance a decade ago; has now surpassed the million microfinance client mark and is fast moving towards two million.
Research shows that the African microfinance sector is a dynamic and growing marketplace. Some of the new financial tools have been successful and are beginning to spread. For example, community managed loan funds, are predicted to reach 30 million poor by 2015. In general, since 2005 there has been a spurt of overall growth in microfinance activity in sub-Saharan Africa. The region’s aggregate loan portfolio increased by 69 percent from 2006 to 2007 and savings increase by 60 percent in the same period of time (Diagnostic to Action, 2009). In East Africa alone (specifically Tanzania, Uganda, Ethiopia, and Kenya) the number of borrowers increased by 584 percent y/y in 2007.
Table 1: Snapshot of Microfinance in South Asia*
No. of MFIs |
No. of Borrowers (thousands) |
Total Population (mill.) |
Poor Population (mill.) |
Penetration Rates |
||
Borrowers / pop. (%) |
Borrowers / poor (%) |
|||||
Angola |
2 |
11 |
17 |
6.5 |
0.1% |
0.2% |
Benin |
16 |
137 |
9 |
2.6 |
1.5% |
5.2% |
Botswana |
1 |
0 |
2 |
0.8 |
0.0% |
0.0% |
Burkina Faso |
15 |
900 |
15 |
6.9 |
6.1% |
13.1% |
Burundi |
7 |
77 |
9 |
5.8 |
0.9% |
1.3% |
CAR |
1 |
2 |
4 |
2.6 |
0.1% |
0.1% |
Cameroon |
27 |
198 |
19 |
7.5 |
1.1% |
2.7% |
Cape Verde |
1 |
2 |
1 |
0.2 |
0.3% |
0.9% |
Chad |
3 |
20 |
11 |
6.9 |
0.2% |
0.3% |
Congo |
18 |
33 |
4 |
1.5 |
0.9% |
2.2% |
Congo, DR |
33 |
221 |
62 |
30.3 |
0.4% |
0.7% |
Cote D'Ivoire |
18 |
54 |
19 |
8.7 |
0.3% |
0.6% |
Eritrea |
1 |
22 |
4 |
2.3 |
0.5% |
1.0% |
Ethiopia |
22 |
1,741 |
79 |
35.0 |
2.2% |
5.0% |
Gabon |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0.3 |
0.0% |
0.0% |
Gambia, The |
9 |
96 |
2 |
1.0 |
5.6% |
9.1% |
Ghana |
65 |
438 |
23 |
6.7 |
1.9% |
6.6% |
Guinea |
8 |
97 |
9 |
3.8 |
1.0% |
2.6% |
Kenya |
28 |
975 |
38 |
19.5 |
2.6% |
5.0% |
Liberia |
1 |
3 |
4 |
1.7 |
0.1% |
0.2% |
Madagascar |
13 |
79 |
20 |
14.0 |
0.4% |
0.6% |
Malawi |
8 |
313 |
14 |
9.1 |
2.3% |
3.4% |
Mali |
19 |
313 |
12 |
7.9 |
2.5% |
4.0% |
Mozambique |
8 |
75 |
21 |
11.6 |
0.4% |
0.6% |
Namibia |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1.1 |
0.1% |
0.2% |
Niger |
6 |
216 |
14 |
8.9 |
1.5% |
2.4% |
Nigeria |
60 |
1,514 |
148 |
50.5 |
1.0% |
3.0% |
Rwanda |
9 |
155 |
10 |
5.9 |
1.6% |
2.6% |
Senegal |
30 |
389 |
12 |
4.1 |
3.1% |
9.4% |
Sierra Leone |
10 |
47 |
6 |
4.1 |
0.8% |
1.2% |
South Africa |
7 |
637 |
48 |
15.5 |
1.3% |
4.1% |
Swaziland |
1 |
14 |
1 |
0.8 |
1.3% |
1.8% |
Tanzania |
16 |
249 |
40 |
14.4 |
0.6% |
1.7% |
Togo |
21 |
121 |
7 |
3.1 |
1.8% |
3.9% |
Uganda |
29 |
360 |
31 |
11.7 |
1.2% |
3.1% |
Zambia |
6 |
28 |
12 |
8.1 |
0.2% |
0.3% |
Zimbabwe |
12 |
53 |
13 |
4.6 |
0.4% |
1.1% |
Aggregate SSA |
533.0 |
9,593.1 |
742.5 |
326 |
||
Average in SSA Countries |
14.4 |
259.3 |
20.1 |
8.8 |
1.2% |
2.7% |
* From: Gonzalez, Adrian, 2008. “How Many Borrowers and Microfinance Institutions (MFIs) Exist?” Microfinance Information Exchange (MIX), Washington, D.C.
Facilitating the substantial growth trends in the microfinance industry are the regulatory changes conducted as governments increased their focus on regulating microfinance. Many countries in the region have included microfinance in banking legislation, broader non-banking financial institution (NBFI) legislation, or microfinance specific laws or regulations. According to a CGAP and MIX report, 31 countries passed new or revised microfinance legislation since 2002, while 24 countries have adopted national microfinance strategies which integrate MFI regulation under the formal financial supervisory institution. In addition, a growing number of countries have placed the supervision of MFIs under the same body that supervises formal financial institutions. The key challenge, however, is implementation of such laws and regulations, especially in the context of low balance and low transaction value as seen in most microfinance institutions (Africa Microfinance Analysis and Benchmarking Report, 2008).
Accompanying the increased number of financial access projects (increase of 61 percent increase 2007 compared to 2006), is an expected drop in external funding. In 2007, funders had a total commitment of $1.76 billion, covering 716 projects in the 48 countries of sub-Saharan Africa, a 12 percent decrease from 2006. This decrease in implies that MFIs which use savings mobilization as a main funding source have experienced rapid growth, while those with low financial intermediation have stagnated outreach (Africa Microfinance Analysis and Benchmarking Report, 2008).
Funders in SSA include a wide variety of actors, though most are non-commercial publicly funded institutions, as CGAP reports that private funds (MIVs) have only invested $69 million in the region (CGAP Funders Survey, 2009). In general, funders focus on supporting retail institutions. Additional projects include supporting financial infrastructure, and supporting policy environments.
Funding instruments in SSA vary depending on the project objective, the country context, other stakeholders, and so on. In 2007 they favored grants (34 percent) and loans (32 percent). Bilateral funders and international NGOs were the main providers of grants, while loans were funded primarily by Development Finance Institutions (DFIs), MIVs, private foundations, multilateral funders and international NGOs. Equity funding (5 percent) and guarantees (3 percent) came largely from DFIs. Although both savings and debt increased, equity increased more rapidly. According to the Africa Benchmarking Report, an infusion of capital in the banks in this region which increased their equity by 309 percent over the last year, accounted for 85 percent of equity increase (Africa Microfinance Analysis and Benchmarking Report, 2008).
Table 2: Funding Structure Trend Data*
SSA Funding |
Savings |
Commercial Debt |
Other Debt |
Equity |
2006 |
1,148 |
243 |
376 |
557 |
2007 |
1,839 |
343 |
680 |
912 |
% Increase |
60% |
41% |
81% |
64% |
*See Research Section for complete report, including the model and detailed country-by-county data.
IAMFI has compiled additional statistical data on each country in this region regarding population size, poverty rates, foreign capital flows, investors’ environment ratings and sovereign ratings. IAMFI members can access these data here.
For more information and details on the sources used to create this section, please see research section below, or click here.
Back to top
MIVs in Sub Saharan Africa
While most MIVs spread their microfinance investments around the world, listed below are MIVs that chose to focus their investment in the SSA region or in specific countries within the region. To read more general information on MIVs and their challenges see the Microfinance Investment Vehicles section.
MIVs with Exclusive SSA Focus
- ACCION Investments in Microfinance (AIM) - ACCION International
- Fonds International de Garantie (FIG) - RAFAD Foundation
MIVs with non-Exclusive SSA Focus
- Africap Microfinance Fund – AfriCap
- PlaNet MicroFund – PlaNIS
- La Fayette Participations - Horus Development Finance
- Access Holding - LFS Financial Systems
Microfinance Networks in Sub Saharan Africa
What are microfinance networks?
A microfinance network is commonly an umbrella organization for multiple microfinance institutions, providing an avenue for cooperation and support. Through these networks, network member MFIs can share ideas, experiences, and solutions common challenges. In addition, networks help facilitate the MFI’s funding and investing procedures by connecting their members with funders and investors. Many times, networks strengthen operational, technical, and financial capacity of MFIs by promoting MFI standards and best practices and training.
Some microfinance networks promote a particular methodology through technical assistance (such as ACCION or Women’s World Banking) and may have a partial or whole equity stake in their members and partners. Country and regional microfinance networks have an additional focus on advocating local microfinance policies and help members transform into regulated deposit-taking financial intermediaries. In these networks, members are partial owners themselves of the network and govern the network through seats on the Board of Directors.
Accion |
|
Africa Microfinance Network (AFMIN)
|
|
African Rural and Agricultural Credit Association (AFRACA)
|
|
Alliance of Micro Enterprise Development Practitioners / Micro Enterprise Alliance (MEA)
|
|
Association of Microfinance Institutions of Uganda (AMFIU)
|
|
Care / Planet Finance Centrale des Risques
|
|
Développement international Desjardins (DID)
|
|
Foundation for International Community Assistance (FINCA)
|
|
Freedom from Hunger (FFH)
|
|
Grameen Foundation
|
|
International Network of Alternative Financial Institutions (INAFI)
|
|
Micro Finance South Africa (MFSA)
|
|
Small Enterprise Education Promotion Network (SEEP) |
|
Research on Sub Saharan Africa Microfinance
FinAccess National Survey 2009 |
Studying Kenya’s changing financial landscape. The survey provides information to policy makers about the main barriers to access, as an impetus for necessary reforms. It also provides information to the private sector about market opportunities, and in particular insight into the types of products that will suit newly identified, underserved market segments. This is information is backed by solid empirical basis to track progress and evaluate the effect of various government-led and donor-led initiatives; |
Published by: FSD Kenya and Central Bank of Kenya |
June 2009 |
Making Insurance Markets Work for the Poor: Microinsurance Policy, Regulation and Supervision - Uganda Case Study |
Role of regulation in development of microinsurance market in Uganda. The Ugandan experience highlights the challenges of expanding microinsurance access in a poor developing economy with an underdeveloped financial sector. Low-income individuals need to be won over through positive experiences in credit life insurance to break their mistrust of insurance. The introduction of a new regulatory regime offers an opportunity to facilitate financial inclusion. |
Smith, A., Hendrie, S., Bester, H. and Rukondo, M., |
Published by: CGAP Working Group on Microinsurance |
12 Jan 2009 |
Access to Finance in Nigeria: Microfinance, Branchless Banking, and SME Finance |
Identifying key issues to improving access to finance.This report analyzes access to finance in Nigeria, and identifies key issues for microfinance, branchless banking and SME finance. Important issues across all three sectors include increasing transparency, strengthening capacity and promoting financial infrastructure and consumer protection. Branchless banking can be improved by promoting interoperability of the retail payment system, and ensuring that mobile payments guidelines address key issues such as the use of agents. |
Isern, J., Agbakoba, A., Flaming, M., Mantilla, J., Pellegrini, G. and Tarazi |
Published by: CGAP |
January 2009 |
Africa Microfinance Analysis and Benchmarking Report 2008 |
This report analyzes the development of African microfinance in 2007, focusing on growth trends, national and regional regulatory environments, funding flows and structure, and MFI performance. It also provides information on the four subregions, namely, Central, East, Southern and West Africa.In 2007, sub-Saharan Africa experienced economic growth of 6.7 percent. It also attracted attention of the private sector, funders, domestic and international investors, and development agencies. |
Published by: CGAP and Microfinance Information Exchange - the MIX |
2008 |
Diagnostic to Action: Microfinance in Africa |
Examining major achievements, challenges and growth trends in the microfinance sector. This diagnostic found that more people in low-income segments across Africa are now able to access an increasing range of financial products even in very harsh environments. The primary condition for success appears to be related to leadership and regulation. It is essential to develop an accurate picture of microfinance in Africa in order build international recognition in investing in Africa, and to spell out the role of governments in formulating policy and providing enabling regulatory frameworks. Publishing this study is the first step to an African articulation of its own strategy to solving its problems. |
Published by: WWB and Africa Microfinance Action Forum (AMAF) |
2008 |
Attracting Microfinance Investment Funds: Promoting Microfinance Growth through Increased Investments in Kenya
Policy recommendations and sources of alternative funding for Kenyan MFIs. This paper analyzes why MFIs are facing problems in effectively and efficiently delivering financial services in Kenya, and suggests solutions. Competition for accessing funds and its limited availability have undermined MFIs’ capability to expand their financial services activities in the country. The paper explores the feasibility of microfinance investment funds (MIFs) as key drivers for channeling alternative sources of funding to the sector.
Jeffrey Ben Matu
Published by: Duke University
April 2008
Download Article
Transversal Analysis of MFI Performance in Africa
External performance evaluation and rating of MFIs. This study was commissioned by the African Microfinance Transparency (AMT). It is based on data from rating reports produced for AMT members as well as rating reports of several non-member African MFIs. The study draws conclusions on characteristics of African MFIs and microfinance sector in the region. The analysis shows that African MFI s are becoming more mature and professional, and have a better grasp of their loan portfolios and operational costs.
Published by: African Microfinance Transparency (AMT)
September 2008
Download Article
2007 CGAP Regional Funder Survey: Sub-Saharan Africa
CGAP survey of funder projects, specific country activities, and funding instruments. This report summarizes the results of a CGAP survey of funders working in Africa to increase access to finance. A total of 40 respondents provided self-reported information on their general projects, specific activities in each country and funding instruments. The report recommends that funders maximize their effectiveness in supporting access to finance in Sub-Saharan Africa, by collaborating with other funders, and by analyzing their own strengths and weaknesses in terms of strategic clarity, staff capacity, knowledge management, appropriate instruments and accountability for results.
Published by: Consultative Group to Assist the Poor - CGAP
2008
Download Article
Implementing FATF Standards in Developing Countries and Financial Inclusion: Findings and Guidelines
This report considers the impact of the implementation of Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Combating the Financing of Terrorism (CFT) controls on financial inclusion in five countries - Indonesia, Kenya, Mexico, Pakistan and South Africa. Key findings in the report include: Financial inclusion and an effective AML/CFT regime are complementary financial sector policy objectives; Imposition of AML/CFT controls have an impact on access and usage of financial services in the countries concerned; Countries are finding ways to limit AML/CFT risk while promoting financial inclusion. Based on these findings, the paper develops a set of guidelines to assist authorities in developing countries to design effective AML/CFT regimes that are compliant with Financial Action Task Force (FATF) standards and support financial inclusion.
Hennie Bester, Doubell Chamberlain, Louis de Koker, Christine Hougaard, Ryan Short, Anja Smith, Richard Walker
Published by: First Initiative
February 2008
Download Article



